‘The State has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State, for the right of the world spirit is above all privileges.’
For quite some time now the political stratosphere has been dominated by a seemingly indominable force that seeks to continually enforce its polemical ideologies on the citizens of the world. For the past couple centuries mankind has witnessed some of the bloodiest, most inhumane and most unjustified acts of aggression; all perpetrated by a well-woven, well-lubricated matrix of clandestine operations and dealings.
One of the most prominent channels these ‘elites’ have used to methodologically subjugate the masses to their whims has been usage of what is now known as Hegelian dialectical reasoning. This process incorporates a very simple yet very effective protocol of transforming the collective psyche of a social population into agreement with the contentions and intentions of the implemeting agents.
The formula for this reasoning is as follows. Hegelian dialectics implements a trilateral approach to a situation through which the agents communicate a thesis, or ideology, of a specific group or individual. This is done for some time until the population is made aware of the issue, after which another view is communicated; this is usually in contradiction to the original thesis, acting as an antithesis, and serves to offer another perspective of the same issue. This, unfortunately, has been proven to confuse the target group and throw their understandings into disarray. When tension is built between the proponents of the two positions, a third view- the synthesis- is introduced which functions to compromise between the first two contentions, forming a hybrid position of diluted ideas via each of the original contentions. This third ‘solution’ becomes readily accepted by the people as it functions to relieve the tension and confusion of all affected parties, thus allowing for the waning of concern regarding the issue- ultimately handing authority of the situation to those who had offered both the original problem and the concession.
This all simplifies to the equation: problem, reaction, solution. Again, first comes an introduction of a problem that threatens the well-being of the society. Then, an alternative is put on the table which serves to polarize both proponents. Then finally, a solution is endorsed by the ones that created the original problems. This is automatically accepted by the people and they trust it will be taken care of at that point… so they continue onwards with their lives. The lives they are being told to lead, not ones in which they choose to lead. We are all subject to this psychological mind-play, whether you are cognizant of it or not.
This can be shown to be the root methodological approach to most ‘problems’ of our recent times and it can be proven that not only has it been successful in subduing the masses, but also successful in amalgamating support to carry on with their agendas- whatever they might be.
Hegelian Marxism has been the front runner in implementing this sort of reasoning. They have been successful in it too, bringing the new age of ‘enlightened’ mankind to an ideal, utopian flavor of world communism. Or so they say, I think we’d describe it as something else. They have named this, however, the New World Order.
Hegel himself was a German philosopher and very much influenced the works of Marx, Darwin and Spencer. Herbert Spencer was an interesting fella who was, contrary to popular understanding, actually the one that coined the phrase, ‘survival of the fittest’. He had meant it in a context of societal evolution, with leading philosophical axioms like ‘might makes right’ and ‘matter over the mind’–basically, neo-Stoic materialism packaged as psuedo-intellectual political metaphysics. This idea was then borrowed by Darwin and woven into his book the Origin of Species, where Darwin tried to mold Spencer’s theorem into a biological mechanism. To which he failed terribly. Yet, the idea continues forth into the 21st century all thanks to the beast that is Hegelian Marxism.
This idea, though now relatively recently coined by Hegel and molded in time into an ideological roadmap for political consolidation of power, is nothing really new. The Quran talks about similar ‘elites’ of the ancients who had grasped totalitarian authority over the land and subjected their citizens to harm. God says:
Indeed Pharaoh transgressed in the land and divided its people into sections. One group of them he humiliated, and slew their sons and spared their daughters. Truly he was among the mischief-makers. (The Stories:4)
This verse talks about Pharaoh, the authoritarian dictator of Egypt, and the corruption he sowed. He divided his population into different camps (think right- and left-wing, have and have-nots, bourgeoisie and proletariats) and even went as far as making an ‘example’ of one group and totally wiping them out. Now, is there an equivalent to this in the modern context? Sure there is.
If one was to look at the political landscape of the post-modern West, one can see that the rule of a closely knit group of people had grasped power of the land. The following is a statement by former President John F. Kennedy, before he was silenced for talking too much:
The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings…And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
Does President Kennedy speak the words of a maniac or of someone in desperation, warning the people of the reality that is the socio-political coup that has hijacked this nation? I beg the latter.
Thus, we can make the similitude of Pharaoh to the ones that President Kennedy had attributed to be members of these secretive cults. Furthermore, the dividing of people into sections can also be seen in the intra-class warfare being waged now on the extreme camps of the socio-political spectrum. And the one group that the modern day Pharaohnic entity has chosen for its sacrifice has been, without any inkling of doubt- the black man. The same black man that was subject to some of the most humiliating and degrading circumstances in history are, to this day, the most oppressed peoples living in the West. The numbers speak for themselves. There are more blacks in the California prison systems than prisoners in all jails in the world combined. That’s a fact. One in three black males in America have, are, or will spend at least one stint in a U.S government subsidized prison. This is the reality. This is what we are living in right now.
The truth speaks for itself. We are living in a world that has been molded by the neo-Pharaohnic principles of the political elite, and we have been subconsciously boxed into a corner of blind obedience and acceptance. Acknowledgement of this reality is the first step to rehabilitation. It is imperative that we understand this.
Problem, reaction, solution can be seen in many examples in the near past. It can be seen in the media propaganda machine pre-WWII, the Vietnam war era, the Cold War era, the Gulf War era, and the modern day wars the United States is currently waging. The attacks of 9/11 were the problem, the reaction was orchestrated with campaigns of mass fear and ‘terror’ programming. And the solution? Go bomb two sovereign nations that had nothing to do with 9/11. And had no weapons of mass destruction. BBC did an interview a couple years back where they interviewed some Afghani villagers living in Kandahar province, and found that they actually had never heard of 9/11. And when they were told what happened they were disgusted by it. Many of these people don’t even know why their country has been sacked and savagely ravaged. Total black of knowledge. It is unbelievable.
Two false premises do not yield a sound conclusion. This makes the Hegelian reasoning formula an construct of fallacious deductive reasoning. Logically, the syllogism does not hold and I’m sure the great logicians the likes of Socrates and Aristotle would be rolling in their graves at the sight of this; at the witnessing of how this evil, logically unsound and totally unethical philosophical formula managed to control the world and harness so much evil. I believe the decline in morality is a result of this problem and it has most obviously served the opposite result of social ‘evolution’. Rather, it has exacerbated the de-evolution of man into a sort of transhumanist archetype that eats what it is told to eat, watches what it is told to watch, feels what it is told to feel and agrees to what it is told to agree with. A robot. We are now dealing with nothing shorter than a generation of mindless, unintelligent robots. Do you see what I’m seeing?
This is what they want. A worker class that is just smart enough to do the tasks they are apportioned to do yet just dumb enough to not realize how badly the system is screwing them. We must break this if we are to make any change. We must realize our missteps and seek to retrace our steps up the arduous mountain of oppression that is before us if we are to make any progress in this world. It is something that must be done, sooner better than later. Knowledge of this Dajjalic deception, I believe, is a good start.